Translate

Monday, November 23, 2015

2016 Camaro SS vs 2016 Mustang GT -- full specifications

http://st.motortrend.com/uploads/sites/5/2015/11/2016-Chevrolet-Camaro-SS-VS-Ford-Mustang-GT-front-three-quarter-in-motion.jpg?interpolation=lanczos-none&fit=around%7C660%3A%2A
I remember growing up in the 80's always wanting a Chevy Camaro V8. Of course lack of sufficient funds and high gas prices always kept me away from a purchase. Closest I came was a rusty used 1977 Chevy Nova (305) V8 with double exhaust, but wow did it move.
Back to the battle.
The 2016 Mustang GT packs under the hood a Coyote 5L V8 engine producing 435 hp @ 6,500 rpm and 400 lb-ft of torque @ 4,250 rpm. Engine power is mated to a 6 speed manual gearbox driving the rear wheels.
Now for 2016 Camaro SS receives Corvette’s LT1 6.2 L V8 producing 455 hp @ 6,000 rpm and 455 lb-ft of torque @ 4,400 rpm. Like the Mustang engine power is mated to a 6 speed manual gearbox driving the rear wheels.
Another factor at play is the weight difference, at at 3,672 pounds (1665 kg) the Camaro is much lighter than the Mustang which comes in at 3,825 pounds (1734 kg).
The 2016 Mustang GT has a 0-60 mph (96.5 km/h) time of 4.6 seconds, quarter mile comes in 12.9 seconds at 110 mph (177.03 km/h).
The 2016 Camaro SS has a 0-60 mph (96.5 km/h) time of 4.0 seconds, quarter mile comes in 12.4 seconds at 114.6 mph (184.43 km/h).
While the Mustang laps the figure eight in 24.4 seconds averaging 0.82 g, it is bettered by the Camaro. Camaro will complete the figure eight in 24.1 seconds and averaging 0.85 g.
Spec wise on paper it looks like the Camaro SS has an slight advantage over the Mustang GT. Although is it worth paying almost $9000 more for that slight extra performace? ($47,350-$38,600 US dollars)
http://st.motortrend.com/uploads/sites/5/2015/11/2016-Chevrolet-Camaro-SS-VS-Ford-Mustang-GT-rear-three-quarter.jpg?interpolation=lanczos-none&fit=around%7C660%3A%2A
Full specifications:

2016 Chevrolet Camaro SS 2016 Ford Mustang GT (Perf Pack)
POWERTRAIN/CHASSIS
DRIVETRAIN LAYOUT Front-engine, RWD Front-engine, RWD
ENGINE TYPE 90-deg V-8, alum block/heads 90-deg V-8, alum block/heads
VALVETRAIN OHV, 2 valves/cyl DOHC, 4 valves/cyl
DISPLACEMENT 376.1 cu in/6,162cc 302.1 cu in/4,951cc
COMPRESSION RATIO 11.5:1 11.0:1
POWER (SAE NET) 455 hp @ 6,000 rpm* 435 hp @ 6,500 rpm
TORQUE (SAE NET) 455 lb-ft @ 4,400 rpm* 400 lb-ft @ 4,250 rpm
REDLINE 6,500 rpm 6,500 rpm
WEIGHT TO POWER 8.1 lb/hp 8.8 lb/hp
TRANSMISSION 6-speed manual 6-speed manual
AXLE/FINAL-DRIVE RATIO 3.73:1/1.87:1 3.73:1/2.43:1
SUSPENSION, FRONT; REAR Struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar Struts, coil springs, anti-roll bar; multilink, coil springs, anti-roll bar
STEERING RATIO 15.8:1 16.0:1
TURNS LOCK-TO-LOCK 2.3 2.7
BRAKES, F; R 13.6-in vented disc; 13.3-in vented disc, ABS 15.0-in vented disc; 13.0-in vented disc, ABS
WHEELS, F; R 8.5 x 20-in; 9.5 x 20-in, cast aluminum 9.0 x 19-in; 9.5 x 19-in, cast aluminum
TIRES, F; R 245/40R20 95Y; 275/35R20 98Y Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 255/40R19 96Y; 275/40R19 101Y Pirelli P Zero
DIMENSIONS
WHEELBASE 110.7 in 107.1 in
TRACK, F/R 63.0/62.9 in 62.3/64.9 in
LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT 188.3 x 74.7 x 53.1 in 188.3 x 75.4 x 54.4 in
TURNING CIRCLE 38.4 ft 40.0 ft
CURB WEIGHT 3,672 lb 3,825 lb
WEIGHT DIST, F/R 54/46% 54/46%
SEATING CAPACITY 4 4
HEADROOM, F/R 38.5/35.0 (est) in 37.6/34.8 in
LEGROOM, F/R 44.3/29.9 in 44.5/30.6 in
SHOULDER ROOM, F/R 55.0/50.4 in 56.3/52.2 in
CARGO VOLUME 9.0 cu ft (est) 13.5 cu ft
TEST DATA
ACCELERATION TO MPH
0-30 1.7 sec 1.7 sec
0-40 2.4 2.4
0-50 3.1 3.4
0-60 4.0 4.6
0-70 5.0 5.8
0-80 6.3 7.1
0-90 7.7 8.9
0-100 9.3 10.8
0-110 11.4 12.9
PASSING, 45-65 MPH 1.8 2.2
QUARTER MILE 12.4 sec @ 114.6 mph 12.9 sec @ 110.0 mph
BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 104 ft 109 ft
LATERAL ACCELERATION 1.00 g (avg) 0.96 g (avg)
MT FIGURE EIGHT 24.1 sec @ 0.85 g (avg) 24.4 sec @ 0.82 g (avg)
TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 1,400 rpm 1,700 rpm
CONSUMER INFO
BASE PRICE $37,295 $35,695
PRICE AS TESTED $38,600 (est) $47,350
STABILITY/TRACTION CONTROL Yes/yes Yes/yes
AIRBAGS Dual front, front side, f/r curtain, front knee Dual front, front side, f/r curtain, front knee
BASIC WARRANTY 3 yrs/36,000 miles 3 yrs/36,000 miles
POWERTRAIN WARRANTY 5 yrs/100,000 miles 5 yrs/60,000 miles
ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE 5 yrs/100,000 miles 5 yrs/60,000 miles
FUEL CAPACITY 19.0 gal 16.0 gal
EPA CITY/HWY/COMB ECON 14/26/18 mpg (est) 15/25/19 mpg
ENERGY CONS, CITY/HWY 241/130 kW-hrs/100 miles (est) 225/135 kW-hrs/100 miles
CO2 EMISSIONS, COMB 1.10 lb/mile (est) 1.06 lb/mile
RECOMMENDED FUEL Unleaded premium Unleaded premium
*SAE Certified

Source: MotorTrend.com, for the full article with wonderful photos: http://www.motortrend.com/news/2016-chevrolet-camaro-ss-vs-2016-ford-mustang-gt/

Sunday, November 15, 2015

Google car pulled over in California for driving too slowly

http://picolio.auto123.com/auto123-media/articles/2015/11/61447/googleen.jpg?crop=13,159,621,207&scaledown=1024
Funny post of the month.........
Very few drivers actually get pulled over for driving too slowly, but in this case who should the officer make the ticket out to?

"In California this week, a shocking arrest as a Google self-driving car was photographed being pulled over by a motorcycle policeman for driving too slowly, as posted on the Re/Code website, which took the photograph from the Google+ page of the Google Self-Driving Project.
The incident took place after police noticed a car moving at only 25 mph (38 km/h) on a road with a 35 mph (56 km/h) speed limit.
Ultimately no ticket was issued by police, although according to some news outlets the policeman did explain to the car’s occupant – self-driving car only means there is no driver – that it was slowing down traffic."
Source, Auto123 article: http://www.auto123.com/en/news/google-car-stopped-driving-too-slow/61447/

Sunday, November 8, 2015

Update 2015-2016 Winter tire OFFICIAL testing

The APA (Automobile Protection Agency) just released a fairly long and detailed list of winter tires for the 2015-2016 season. This is one of the few web-sites I really trust for unbiased testing information. Using the most standard size of 205/55/16 on compact cars, here are their conclusions:

TOP RATED:
Bridgestone Blizzak WS80          $189
Nokian Hakkapelitta R2               $209

VERY GOOD:
Continental WinterContact SI      $170
Gislaved Nord*Frost 100             $165
Michelin X-Ice Xi3                       $205
Pirelli Ice Zero FR                       $157
Toyo Observe GSi5                     $175

GOOD:
Dunlop Winter Maxx                    $159
General Altimax Arctic                $155
Hercules Avalanche R-G2            $149
Nokian Nordman 5                      $160
Pirelli Carving Edge                     $175
Vredestein SnowTrac 5                $N/A
Yokohama Ice Guard IG52c          $175

ACCEPTABLE:
BF Goodrich WinterSlalom KSI    $170
Firestone Winterforce                  $151
Goodyear Ultra Grip Winter          $139
Hankook Winter i*Pike RS           $149
Toyo Observe G3 ICE                  $148

BELOW AVERAGE:
Hercules HSI-S                            $N/A
Nexen WinGuard 231                   $N/A
WestLake F606                           $105

AVOID:
Jinyu YW51 S                             $85
Weathermate HW501                  $N/A

I strongly suggest you follow this link to the APA for a full description of the pros and cons of the above tires. There is also another list called "budget priced" tires. http://www.apa.ca/wintertire_reviews.asp

The APA has also included a PERFORMANCE WINTER TIRE review section, follow this link: http://www.apa.ca/WinterTires2013-Performance.asp